|
|
Post by opene on Jan 17, 2017 0:55:47 GMT
A short Sneak Peak of what we build for the Event for the People to meet   |
|
|
|
Post by opene on Jan 19, 2017 9:00:51 GMT
Building on hold because the Deed Wolfborn on south is blocking further building. we could plan the Bridge but not Build.
The owner Laneyah isnt on the Forum so we cant ontact her.
If anyone sees her online ingame. please tell her to contact us.
So long. were waiting. Everthing is prepared
|
|
|
|
Post by klarseth on Jan 19, 2017 21:36:40 GMT
Please raise the bridge. The bridge is too low to go under with a boat.
|
|
|
|
Post by densetsu0601 on Jan 20, 2017 3:39:12 GMT
I have been noticing that most of the bridge sections were really low on the water. What kinds of ships have you tried so far Klarseth? With the span of the bridge tho totally agree that at least a few sections should be passable by any type ship. This would cut off a huge water way to traffic if not raised to high enough level.
|
|
|
|
Post by opene on Jan 20, 2017 12:15:18 GMT
we planned 2 open endings on each side so ships can pass like u see on our screenshots we did one in silverlake
btw a bit late. were posting since october and no one said something.. Ships can cross on the both bridge endings.
|
|
|
|
Post by klarseth on Jan 20, 2017 15:54:22 GMT
So, as it stands, the only access to the entire bay is at the north end? And this bay has just been turned into a lake?
|
|
|
|
Post by olloyd on Jan 20, 2017 16:03:04 GMT
You planned poorly. Choking off the bay is not cool! IMO, You need to redo this bridge project so it is not flat to the water! You are limiting access the bay and the rest of the world. FIX IT! When I see the player who has the deed that is currently blocking you from making land fall, I will lobby them to expand their deed all the way to the edge so you can not finish this bridge unless boats can pass in more locations! Think about all the community when you build a bridge please!
Also, who thinks it's cool to drop a dirt column in someones perimeter blocking their view and access to the coastline they have deeded! Super uncool guys!
|
|
badgirl
Elder
Life is a game play is as it is suppose to be played :)
Posts: 414
|
Post by badgirl on Jan 20, 2017 16:14:18 GMT
we planned 2 open endings on each side so ships can pass like u see on our screenshots we did one in silverlake btw a bit late. were posting since october and no one said something.. Ships can cross on the both bridge endings. i think you will find he is going to have one both ends of the bridge as in big openings on the north and south sides so boats can get through if you read what he has put hence why i quoted it lol ^stated in the quote above^ |
|
|
|
Post by olloyd on Jan 20, 2017 16:31:01 GMT
Not enough badgirl...Go over to the bridge and take a look at the bridge that is almost entirely on the waterline, not even a rowboat can go under the bridge...who wants to go to one side or the other to pass the bridge? And they didn't plan the bridge to be arched on both ends...they didn't think that far ahead, his post they didn't think about it. And they said they were building a bridge (which is fine) but they didn't say they were going to build it at water level so no boats can pass except at two places...Spanning more than 300 tiles!
|
|
badgirl
Elder
Life is a game play is as it is suppose to be played :)
Posts: 414
|
Post by badgirl on Jan 20, 2017 16:45:53 GMT
ok true i have not been over but on the screen shots it looked quite a big hump tbh . so no ships would fit under it? as in aesthetically speaking or physically not fit under? curious now why no one has stated before now but i suppose if you are only looking at screen shots (like me) then you would prob not know that its lower than it looks.as for the one side to another to use the bridge i use the coast to keep my bearings lmao so all good to me there  |
|
|
|
Post by opene on Jan 20, 2017 20:02:23 GMT
i said there is an opening on BOTH sides so no need to cross the whole bridge. please learn to read Olloyd
|
|
|
|
Post by snidor on Jan 20, 2017 20:26:00 GMT
we know, that our bridge is on the lowest possible level, but we have planned 2 passages.
you would a higher bridge? then you are welcome to help. sorry but i think, you have no idea how many dirt we have sank in the bay...
olloyd, don't get me wrong, but we have posted the project in october. we have posted many screenshots but nobody intervened. and when the end is in sight, the people come and say it's bad.why not when we was in the middle? apparent nobody would used the middle part of the bay to sailing.
and the problem with the perimeter. at the time when we were planning the bridges, the south end of the bridge wasn't on perimeter. we have try many times to contacting the owner, but notime somebody was there.
do you think we want to intentionally blocking people? that's not our intention.
|
|
Resa
Elder
VIP
Posts: 114
|
Post by Resa on Jan 20, 2017 20:53:01 GMT
Why would you build a bridge if you did not have a deed on both land ends? You can disband a deed you don't want to keep after your construction is complete. On the south end near Laneyah, just turn it west and attach to that tip of land that points north. andistyr.github.io/wu-map/#434_2698I actually drove out to try to understand how a bridge across water can be "open" on each end, but as you all posted more I suppose you are referring to an "arch" on each end. A water level bridge across that many tiles is strange, confusing and not particularly logical. However, having to cross at one end or the other isn't really an inconvenience as all the deeds are along the edges of the inlet. You would have to sail north or south anyway depending upon your destination. Opene and Olloyd, please discuss opinions in a constructive manner as opposed to insults and demands. I'm certain a compromise can be reached. Perhaps an arch can be rebuilt into the center if enough people are willing to help reconstruct. I volunteer to help if that is a route that can lead to peace and completion. |
|
|
|
Post by opene on Jan 20, 2017 21:05:03 GMT
an additive arch can be ok if he helps. we just think passing on both ends of the bridge is ok
|
|
|
|
Post by olloyd on Jan 21, 2017 6:19:00 GMT
Your blocking players, intentional or not doesn't matter. And yes you posted in october you were building a bridge, you never said you were going to block the server from using the bay by Intentionally placing the bridge so low NOTHING can go under it (defeating the purpose of a bridge). And for the record, I said something a few weeks ago to the GM's, when i realized you were building the bridge too close to the water line. I still think you need to raise all the bridges enough dirt higher that boats can pass under the bridges. ALL of them... AND I think you should remove the perimeter dirt columns you put down on the south end. If someone would have done that to your deeded coast line you would have had a fit. Most all players would. Not fair play IMO, doesn't matter how often someone logs into their deed, no one should ever do what you did, just to get your bridge project done. Do the job right or don't do it at all (IMO).
|
|
